What is Convergence worship?
08-08-2008, 08:44 PM
So, what does all of that mean for WORSHIP?
Worship is one of those words that means lots of things to lots of people. It's hard to discuss the ramifications of any philosophy or belief system within the context of the use of the word "worship", an oft used word that is used pretty loosely in a lot of places to describe what others would call the "song set" or "song service". Others use it to describe the whole congregational service on the chosen day, be it Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, morning or evening, weekend, weekday, or weekday night.
For the purpose of this discussion, we'll borrow some phrases from Dr. Simon Chan's play book, and a few other leading teachers on the subject. Most are paraphrases, but I believe they are true to their sources. <LIST>
Within the context of eucharistic liturgy, the liturgy provides a convenient structure on which to build a weekly or even daily worship "event". Some would suggest that the highest act of worship within western Christianity would be partaking of the Lord's Supper. Most segments of Christianity--denominations, or even some individual congregations--celebrate the Lord's Supper, but some at different levels of participation. That's not the point of discussion here. Most Christo-centric philosophies see the Table as a holy moment, a sacrament in their own definitions. When the whole service is about that Table, the songs, the readings, the responses, the whole service, often including the teaching or sermon, become clearly focused on that one historic, life-changing, world-changing event--"This is my body, broken for you. When you do this, do this to remember me."
Something will drive your services, whether they are indeed worship services, or if they are liturgical, or if they are teaching, equipping, or evangelistic services, or if they are ministry services that seem to spotlight or expect ministry through the gifts of the Holy Spirit. What's driving your services? Can you find a focus for the service instead of using a shotgun approach? I'm not saying that you have to have a "theme" for each service, or that you have to have this or that, but if your service has a focus, that focus will drive your service to a logical conclusion. Does that make sense to you? For those in liturgical services, the Table--the Eucharist or Communion--becomes a natural focus, and one with a broad range of possible angle to approach the service, but still within the context.
If yours is an evangelical service where the focus is on bringing people to Christ, how would you focus your service using music and movement that is addressed to Father, while still addressing the goal of decisions for Jesus? One thought is that people already have a general sense that they need something more and do not need to be told that. Rather one might think that those needy people need to hear about the awesomeness of a God who wants to be in relationship with them. We don't need to dumb down the music for the visitors. We actually need to beef it up! Ramp it up to extol the majesty and might of the One in Whom you want others to invest faith!
Same way for those whose services are more ministry oriented, including but not exclusively the mostly Charismatic congregations. Many of the churches birthed in the "Jesus Movement" days and the early days of the Charismatic Renewal had services that spent a lot of time singing songs that were really focused on the Godhead. Jesus songs, Spirit songs, and even songs that included the Father, too. The songs were mostly scripture passages, and most of them addressed the members of the Godhead. Holy hands were lifted TO God while the voices and hearts were lifted TO God! A good match, that activity. These were mostly NOT songs ABOUT God. Yes, there were some of those, but mostly they were TO Him. There was a focus.
In the last 10 to 15 years, there has been a real move away from the use of scripture songs toward songs that spend more time telling God about what I/we are going to do and how we feel and what we think. There is time and space for SOME of that, IMO, but only a little time and in limited ways. Again, IMO. Nothing wrong with "I love you Lord and I lift my voice". But what about "Here I am, look at me, consider me and that I'm gonna sing to You forever" songs? Where is the focus really? If the focus is on what *I* am going to do, is it still worship??
It's more than a heart attitude. It's more than lip service. It's more than relationship. Worship is action in reaction to our God and What and Who He is in our lives.
Worship is one of those words that means lots of things to lots of people. It's hard to discuss the ramifications of any philosophy or belief system within the context of the use of the word "worship", an oft used word that is used pretty loosely in a lot of places to describe what others would call the "song set" or "song service". Others use it to describe the whole congregational service on the chosen day, be it Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, morning or evening, weekend, weekday, or weekday night.
For the purpose of this discussion, we'll borrow some phrases from Dr. Simon Chan's play book, and a few other leading teachers on the subject. Most are paraphrases, but I believe they are true to their sources. <LIST>
- <LI>
- Worship is a response.</LI>
<LI> - Worship is an action verb, not a noun.</LI>
<LI> - Like most verbs, worship has both a subject and an object.</LI>
<LI> - We are the subjects and God is the object of the worship.</LI>
- <LI>
- Intercession</LI>
<LI> - Thanksgiving</LI>
<LI> - Petition</LI>
<LI> - Asking questions and for wisdom or knowledge</LI>
Within the context of eucharistic liturgy, the liturgy provides a convenient structure on which to build a weekly or even daily worship "event". Some would suggest that the highest act of worship within western Christianity would be partaking of the Lord's Supper. Most segments of Christianity--denominations, or even some individual congregations--celebrate the Lord's Supper, but some at different levels of participation. That's not the point of discussion here. Most Christo-centric philosophies see the Table as a holy moment, a sacrament in their own definitions. When the whole service is about that Table, the songs, the readings, the responses, the whole service, often including the teaching or sermon, become clearly focused on that one historic, life-changing, world-changing event--"This is my body, broken for you. When you do this, do this to remember me."
Something will drive your services, whether they are indeed worship services, or if they are liturgical, or if they are teaching, equipping, or evangelistic services, or if they are ministry services that seem to spotlight or expect ministry through the gifts of the Holy Spirit. What's driving your services? Can you find a focus for the service instead of using a shotgun approach? I'm not saying that you have to have a "theme" for each service, or that you have to have this or that, but if your service has a focus, that focus will drive your service to a logical conclusion. Does that make sense to you? For those in liturgical services, the Table--the Eucharist or Communion--becomes a natural focus, and one with a broad range of possible angle to approach the service, but still within the context.
If yours is an evangelical service where the focus is on bringing people to Christ, how would you focus your service using music and movement that is addressed to Father, while still addressing the goal of decisions for Jesus? One thought is that people already have a general sense that they need something more and do not need to be told that. Rather one might think that those needy people need to hear about the awesomeness of a God who wants to be in relationship with them. We don't need to dumb down the music for the visitors. We actually need to beef it up! Ramp it up to extol the majesty and might of the One in Whom you want others to invest faith!
Same way for those whose services are more ministry oriented, including but not exclusively the mostly Charismatic congregations. Many of the churches birthed in the "Jesus Movement" days and the early days of the Charismatic Renewal had services that spent a lot of time singing songs that were really focused on the Godhead. Jesus songs, Spirit songs, and even songs that included the Father, too. The songs were mostly scripture passages, and most of them addressed the members of the Godhead. Holy hands were lifted TO God while the voices and hearts were lifted TO God! A good match, that activity. These were mostly NOT songs ABOUT God. Yes, there were some of those, but mostly they were TO Him. There was a focus.
In the last 10 to 15 years, there has been a real move away from the use of scripture songs toward songs that spend more time telling God about what I/we are going to do and how we feel and what we think. There is time and space for SOME of that, IMO, but only a little time and in limited ways. Again, IMO. Nothing wrong with "I love you Lord and I lift my voice". But what about "Here I am, look at me, consider me and that I'm gonna sing to You forever" songs? Where is the focus really? If the focus is on what *I* am going to do, is it still worship??
It's more than a heart attitude. It's more than lip service. It's more than relationship. Worship is action in reaction to our God and What and Who He is in our lives.
Blessings!
Dean
DeanZF
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB - Hosted by Tierra Hosting